Wednesday, December 09, 2009

Barbara Boxer: December Glass Navel Award Winner

It occurred to me recently that I haven't given out a Glass Navel Award recently. That's a special award we ginned (literally) up in my Georgetown dorm years ago that granted special recognition to individuals whose heads were so far up their nether orifices that they needed a glass navel to see what was plainly in front of them.

Which gets us to Barbara Boxer, very possibly the most intellectually-challenged of all U.S. Senators, which is saying a lot. According to a report in today's San Jose MercuryNews online, Senator Babs has been moved to fury by those of her fellow senators who are trying to dislodge the Holy Sacrament of Taxpayer Supported Abortion from the current version of Obamacare--which bill is in and of itself a metaphorical abortion:
As abortion took center stage in the Senate's historic debate over health care reform, Sen. Barbara Boxer was right in the middle of the fight, provocatively comparing an effort to limit women's access to abortion to restricting men's access to Viagra.

Her combative stance on the issue was a familiar one for the third-term Democrat, whose support of abortion rights has been central to her political career.

"Why are women being singled out here? It's so unfair," Boxer said on the Senate floor Tuesday. "We don't tell men that if they want to ... buy insurance coverage through their pharmaceutical plan for Viagra that they can't do it."
Take it from me, Babs. A great many private insurance policies DON'T cover Viagra and DO cover abortion. You have to pay for Viagra out-of-pocket unless your company has specifically contracted the coverage, which many don't in order to avoid the increased cost. (Don't ask me how I know this.)

As to the difference between a medication designed, essentially, to cause a temporary blood pressure adjustment in a certain, fleeting situation, vs. what many agree is effectively infanticide, particularly in the third trimester--well, that's why we're awarding the senator our Glass Navel to enable her to witness the utter hilarity in her wildly inappropriate illogic.

Barring an unlikely trip to Damascus by the senator, I can only conclude that she's discovered a frand new way to define moral equivalency down.

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Sarah Barracuda Catching Obama

Since the moment she was nominated as John McCain's Vice-presidential running mate in 2008, Sarah Palin and her family have not only been the collective butt of nonstop vitriol and slander. They've been under a nearly-continuous barrage of invective from smart-ass types in both what's left of the media and also in the (so-called) entertainment business. In the latter (re: the smarmy David Letterman), Palin's always fair game for a cheap joke, as is her family. (Here's a typical, showbiz-oriented smear, complete with obviously PhotoShopped graphic.)

Over a year after the national elections, we still know vastly more false information about Palin than we do actual facts about the clueless Chicago enigma successfully promoted to the presidency by the press, the professors, the trial lawyers, and everyone else that's smarter than you and me.

Palin was widely derided by the usual suspects for resigning her Alaska governorship and rolling out a book tour. I don't much back this kind of resignation myself on the grounds that if you win an election and take an oath to serve, you need to serve out your term. That having been said, the constant media sniping, coupled with the never-ending attacks on Palin and her family originating with Alaska old-boy pols (even fellow Republicans) made it virtually impossible for Palin to govern in an effective way. Which, of course, was the point of the barrage of attacks.

So Palin did the logical thing. She took herself out of the political fire and went back to being a private citizen.

But she clearly had something up her sleeve. The book and the ongoing promo tour have the dual task of making money for Palin and her family. And making so much of it that it might give her a campaign war-chest starter fund for a run against Obama in 2012.

The press and the pols, as usual, sneered and jeered from the sidelines. Their collective aim, in point of fact, is to continue 2008's demonization campaign in hopes of keeping her off the Republican ticket in 2008. Why? Because, the woman they sneer at and condescend to at the drop of a hat is their worst nightmare. She's an attractive, Conservative, combative female who can hold her own in a debate (re: Biden) and who, gasp, is actually a mom and is proud of it. And oh, yeah, she's a practicing Christian which makes her far scarier to the media than Osama bin Laden. I.e., now that the media-induced Obama haze is being rubbed from America's collective eyes, there's every possibility they're going to want to repent in 2012 by bringing someone like them back to the White House.

Want proof?
Obama's new Gallup Poll job approval number is 47%. Last month it was 53%.

Regular Ticket readers will recall how in this space in late November we pointed out that Obama's closely watched job approval slide was coinciding with Palin's little-noticed rise in favorability. And it appeared they might cross somewhere in the 40s.

Well, ex-Sen. Obama, meet ex-Gov. Palin.

The new CNN/Opinion Research Poll shows Palin now at 46% favorable, just one point below her fellow basketball fan. 
Scary stuff for the liberal elites. Although this particular piece of info comes from the LA Times of all places, although it runs in a political puff piece whose attitude is a little suspect.

Needless to say, the brownshirts on the left are now even more enraged and inclined toward juvenile retaliation:
Political history is not usually made on a second-floor balcony in the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minn.

But that's where 33-year-old Jeremy Paul Olson lost it Monday. Observing the lines and hoopla attending former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's book-signing at the mall's Barnes & Noble, Olson lobbed not one but two tomatoes in the direction of the former Republican vice presidential candidate.

Instead he hit a police officer and was arrested for disorderly conduct and assaulting a police officer. Gawker called the Bloomington jail and talked to "a bored-sounding officer ... apparently indifferent to the feat of produce-based heroics." The site added, "If anyone has information on the tomato-wielding Real American Hero Jeremy Paul Olson, please email us. Who is this man? What motivated him to throw tomatoes at Sarah Palin? And most importantly: How could he miss!?
Good question. Anecdote appears in the same newspaper, BTW. The miss by the tomato missile could very well serve as a metaphor for what's about to happen to the Democrats in 2010.

This is the whirlwind the Democrats and their MSM toadies reaped. They are slowly learning that there's a price to be paid for all the smarmy fun they've been having dissing Alaska's former governor. Yep. They pissed off Sarah Barracuda. Paybacks are rough.

Meanwhile, we eagerly await the outraged statement from NOW attacking the thuggish, sexist male behavior on display in the state Al Franken bought.

Monday, December 07, 2009

EPA's Jackson: Damn the Facts, Full Speed Ahead

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson made public the EPA's report/findings on "global warming" and surprise: We have a problem with CO2 and we're all gonna die. Except EPA will save us with batches of onerous and costly regulations to solve a problem we now know has not yet been proven to exist.

And oh, yeah, the hacked East Anglia emails don't matter because they don't prove anything:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson dismissed GOP calls to delay a critical finding on greenhouse emissions in light of hacked e-mails from climate scientists.
More here.

Of course, the EPA report, based on faulty or phony data, does prove that we all have to pay a lot of money to eliminate CO2 from the atmosphere.

Suggestion: Let's save a lot of money. We'll all just hold our breath until we all die. That way we'll be part of the solution, not part of the problem, right Lisa?

Sunday, December 06, 2009

It's Fun to be a Democrat (and Profitable, Too!)

The Right Ohio blog blares the following self-explanatory headline:

Remember Olivia Alair, the Ohio Spokesbabe for the Obama Campaign that Voted Illegally in Franklin County?

You can guess the rest:
She is now making the big bucks at the Department of Transportation.
In the Democrat party, voter fraud is quite profitable.
Yeah, it is.

Meanwhile, up on the Hill, the Senate is looking into "probing" Nevada Republican Senator John Ensign's messy affair. But we get stony silence from Senate moralists about Dem Senator Max Baucus' own dilly-dallying with an aide prior to trying to nominating her to a plum US Attorney opening--a bit closer to a hangin' offense in my opinion. Both affairs were (are?) immoral, but Baucus' is unethical. Like Olivia Alair, however, being a Democrat is never having to say you're sorry. (Except for being a US citizen.)

Kilamanjaro: Where Are the Snows of Yesteryear?

Funny question, actually, since the DC area, aka Wonkerville, was buried under some thick snow yesterday and is likely to get iced-out on Tuesday.

But the point of this entry is the latest ClimateGate fallout--unrelated in this case, actually--wherein Dutch scientists debunk one of the Goracle's signature "global warming" metaphors:
Professor Sinninghe Damste’s research, as discussed on the site of the Dutch Organization of Scientific Research (DOSR) — a governmental body — shows that the icecap of Kilimanjaro was not the result of cold air but of large amounts of precipitation which fell at the beginning of the Holocene period, about 11,000 years ago.

The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of  “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.”
Oops. Never mind. At least the Dutch have chosen to be civilized about their debunking:
DOSR calls Al Gore’s iconic use of the melting cap of Kilimanjaro “unfortunate” — since it now seems to be mainly the result of “natural climate variations.”
Guess Gore's "inconvenient truth" about the Mt. Kilamanjaro snowcap has just gone the way of the St. Christopher story. Or maybe it'll continue to survive like RatherGate, as "fake but accurate" religious dogma for secular humanists.

Read the rest here. Hat tip to RedState for the link.

Are You Unemployed???

Well, if you're outta work (like Mr. and Mrs. Wonker) or a former CEO stocking shelves 2 hours a week at Home Depot, you might THINK you're unemployed. But think again after watching this jolly video:



Even with this week's allegedly big drop from 10.2% to 10% in the allegedly real unemployment rate (which I'll believe when I see the revised figures next month), all this good fortune may not have caught up with you yet. Further, the "unemployment rate" doesn't count those who are underemployed (like our conjectural CEO above) or who've just plain given up looking. If you actually count these folks, too, the real unemployment rate is closer to 17.2% at last estimate. But neither the Feds nor the media want you to know this, because you might blame Pelosi, Reid, and "The One" for collectively impersonating Herbert Hoover.

Worse still, their so-called "stimulus bill" has hardly had any effect on unemployment at all since it was geared toward protecting public employees union jobs that overtaxed locals couldn't pay for. And because the bulk of its actual, rather pitiful "stimulus" spending was cleverly deferred until 2010 so jobs would pick up a bit next spring and summer, just in time for Democrat incumbents to crow about the "improvement" and demand re-election as a reward. If you lose your house in the meantime, who cares? Remember that when these calculating clowns ask for your vote next fall.

Al Gore: Eejit

As we near the opening of the upcoming Copenhagen "global warming" fraud-fest, we hear that its patron saint, Al Gore, will be avoiding as much open public contact as possible, no doubt to dodge unwanted questions on the "inconvenient truth" surrounding the recently exposed hoax now known as ClimateGate.

The character of this dim bulb of an elitist is perhaps best summed up in one word: idiot. For which characteristic we enjoyed substituting the more colorful Irish pronunciation in our headline. No matter what anyone says about Bush, W saved us from having to endure minimum of four years of Gore's ponderous, misinformed, elitist tediousness and condescension in the White House.

The MSM, for its part, has taken great pains to hide his almost unbelievable hypocrisy from us. One example: as Gore and his acolytes tell us to turn down our thermostats and use less toilet paper, neither he nor anyone else currently residing with him at his Tennessee mega-mansion, much bothers to take heed of the unsolicited and unwanted advice he dishes out:
After all his whining about the dangers of fossil fuels and coal-powered electricity plants, and after assuring us we can be “carbon free” by paying attention to “where we set the thermostat, [and] keeping [our] a/c and furnace filters clean,” Gore’s 2006 utility bills for his Nashville home topped $30,000.

His home energy use was literally 20 times the national average.
More here.

I knew that this sort of thing was going on, but I had no idea how over-the-top it was. (We're not even going to begin talking about the private jet over-use.)

By comparison, Mrs. Wonker and myself had an electric bill (our house is all-electric) of approximately $1100 last year, a mere 4% more or less of what the genius from Nashville consumes.  Right, our townhouse is only about 1600 square ft in area, but then again, who's got the more "progressive" carbon footprint, me or Algore? Just a little something to think about before the Copenhagen circus begins.

Saturday, December 05, 2009

...and Speaking of Ohio...

Re: our previous post, Ohio is not entirely without hope. The capable and personable John Kasich may try to wrest the governorship from the Dems next year.

But wait. There's more. A newish blog suddenly to our wondering eyes has appeared that offers a welcome Conservative perspective to the state's hapless, and, we hope, increasingly disgruntled voters. It's called "Right Ohio," and we're adding it to our growing Good Guys list, located, ironically, in the column to the left of this entry.

That's just below the Google Ads we've started up again here in a desperate attempt to bolster our own bottom line here at HazZzMat.

Anyhow, a hearty Christmas greeting to the folks writing for "Right Ohio."

(We'll actually be visiting friends in Toledo and Cleveland over the holidays, BTW.)

Class Struggle in Ohio

Although my home state of Ohio still has tons of the friendliest folks you'll want to meet, the state--particularly its large, northern cities, has been politically dysfunctional since long before I left in the late 1960s. Crippled by union featherbedding and thuggery--particularly on the part of Ohio's arrogant public employees' unions--and rendered almost entirely sclerotic by some of the most polarized racial politics in the nation, state and local governments alike have created one of the worst business climates in the country.

The Great Recession has made things even worse. Whole neighborhoods in Cleveland have been foreclosed due to scads of subprime loans that should have never been made. And of course, even folks who qualified for conventional mortgages are strapped for that monthly payment now because real jobs simply aren't to be had.

But that never keeps the unions from demanding more and more from their taxpayer employers who clearly have less and less. Apparently, no one on either side can do the math anymore and confront the obvious, which is why, I guess, Ohioans, particularly in said big northern cities, keep electing the same bozos (usually Democrats) again and again. The link between cause and effect--i.e., the pols catering to the unions' perpetual class struggle agenda--seems to have been completely severed in voters minds. I just don't get this at all, and I don't think I would even if I lived there.

The latest example of this game is the state's current budget battle. In an era where the state's generally anti-business climate has combined with the Great Recession to eviscerate tax income, the usual suspects just can't seem to understand that there ain't any money anymore to keep unions and racial interest groups paid off as in days of old, particularly in the construction trades.
Lawmakers are close to a budget deal, but construction reform could be the deal breaker.

"It's not going to go. It will not have the support of the legislative black caucus. We've been very clear on that from the very beginning," said Democratic Representative Tracy Maxwell Heard...

"When you're talking about construction reform, we have to address the issues of inclusion, which is the biggest issue we've failed to respond to as a state the last 16 years," Maxwell Heard told ONN's Jim Heath.

Ohio State University President Gordon Gee disagrees. He will testify Monday that this construction reform proposal could save OSU millions of dollars.
What we're talking here is reforming the bidding process, gearing it more to sound budget practices (like maybe picking the lowest bidder for large contracts) and less to the kind of costly, outcome-based social engineering so beloved of Democrats and their pet special interest groups that keep them in office.

Until Ohio grows up and learns to live in the 21st century, it's going to remain an employment backwater. Businesses simply don't need Ohio's enormously high tax burden and operational constraints. Which makes life even tougher and more hopeless for the unemployed taxpayers who are still expected to pay the bills.

It's depressing when you realize that, in some ways, Ohio and its neighbor to the north, Michigan, are now essentially public laboratories. Both states are laying out for us, in advance, where the rest of the country is headed if we sit back and allow the current Democrat Triumverate of Evil--Obama, Pelosi, and Reid--to have their way without mounting a challenge against this kind of miserable fate.

BaucusGate

What an autumn! First we get ClimateGate. Now, we get BaucusGate. Yep, another Democrat paragon of virtue, Montana's Senator Max Baucus, has been carrying on an affair while not yet officially divorced. Now, had he been a Republican, that would be sufficient to have motivated the Senate to expel him. But being a Democrat is never having to say you're sorry.

Lest you think I'm being prudish, there's more to this story. Unfortunately, there are a lot more individuals besides Baucus who run fast and loose with their marital vows. But the crux of the matter here is that while his mistress continued to work for him, presumably at taxpayer expense, he actually had the chutzpah to nominate her for a U.S. attorney position earlier this year.

Given the media's lack of interest in scandals that don't involve Republicans, it's not surprising that this minor little conflict-of-interest situation--which would have gotten you and me fired at work--it's not surprising that it took so long to come out.

Will there now be calls for a Senate investigation of Baucus? Will there now be cries from the Democrat leadership for him to step down in disgrace?

You gotta be kiddin'.

Hat tip to Volokh Conspiracy which has the whole skinny on this. Including, amazingly, a quote from the NYT that actually mentions Baucus' political party. Copy editors must've been asleep.

NYC Raspberries for Holder's Idiotarianism

Okay, the demo wasn't huge as such things go. And the East Coast's cold, blustery, and ultimately snowy day didn't help the turnout.

But the very fact that a decent-sized group respectable New Yorkers organized the first of what could be many demonstrations against AG Eric Holder's beyond-stupid, ideology-driven decision to treat Khalid Sheikh Mohammed--the driving force behind the 9/11 plot against the Twin Towers and the Pentagon--like a Bronx drug dealer signifies. As does their unassailable logic:
Several passionate speakers shared the podium, among them close relatives of 9/11 victims and a surviving firefighter from the first-response teams dispatched to the World Trade Center. They all voiced their disgust at how the administration is handling KSM with gloves of moral priggishness. And they also urged the demonstrators to leave no political stone unturned and to buttonhole their representatives until they take responsibility for this disgrace.
Read the rest here.

Friday, December 04, 2009

"Global Warming" Comes to Houston

Yeah, sure it does. Getta loada this:



Earliest snow in Houston ever, according to a number of weather sources. And it rarely snows there anyway. They oughta send a few snowballs from Houston to Copenhagen in dry ice.

Might also cool the climate-freak delegates down, too, so they can avoid being compromised further by Denmark's charming ladies of the evening. They're making an offer the delegates can't refuse. Such a sly offer could cause a resurgence of "global warming!"

Obama's Surge

A belated comment on the Prez' speech a couple of nights ago, outlining his "decisive" approach to the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan. He failed to impress is West Point audience, which I am told had to be virtually ordered to be polite. (These young warriors know the kind of Commander-in-Chief they've got, and they're not happy about it.) And frankly, he failed to impress me--mainly due to his Cloud Cuckoo-land approach, typical of Marxist academic types who try to impose their fantasy-visions on a world they're not familiar with.

To wit, the very idea of giving a relatively firm deadline for withdrawing his "surge" (which wasn't as much as General McChrystal had asked for) is the kind of stupidity that the Bushies never caved into in spite of a 24/7 onslaught by the media. Telling the enemy when you're going to withdraw allows him to plan a careful withdraw-and-go-hide scenario. The Taliban and Al Qaeda will simply do what they tried to do in Iraq--disappear when the Marines are in town and reappear when they've left. How dumb is that?

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

Australian Parliament Defeats Cap & Trade


Australia's plans for an emissions trading system to combat global warming were scuttled Wednesday in Parliament, handing a defeat to a government that had hoped to set an example at international climate change talks next week...The Senate...rejected his administration's proposal for Australia to become one of the first countries to install a so-called cap-and-trade system to slash the amount of heat-trapping pollution that industries pump into the air....Australia's Parliament Defeats Global Warming Bill, Yahoo News, 12/2/2009

The resignation of five ministers in Australia last week, which followed on the revelations that "climate change" reports from the UN's IPCC and from Britain's CRU in East Anglia were based on falsified data, and this defeat in Parliament of Australia's cap and trade bill, may mark the Midway battle in the fight against the Greens' efforts to destroy the industrial economy. Like Midway, it's not entirely certain to be a complete victory. Like Midway, however, it looks like a turning point.

Luther

Great Recession Investing Update

Back some time ago, I informed our readers that the Mrs. and I had both been laid off our day jobs--the summer of 2008 to be exact. We're still gainfully unemployed, and no manner of networking and resume emailing has produced more than a peep since December of 2008 when I almost snagged the writing job on a contract that was purportedly going to entail compiling a detailed report on the TARP for the White House. When the contractor decided to "no bid" the contract (good choice, actually), that was the end of the opportunity.

I did get a call two weeks ago to fly up to Syracuse, NY to work on a proposal for an unnamed client, but they weren't offering expenses, so I nixed it.

Meanwhile, I've been running and gunning my investment portfolios, largely from rolled over 401(k)s, trying to "get back to even" in the catch phrase of Jim Cramer's latest book (which has quite a few good tips, BTW).

If I hadn't mentioned it already, I'm pleased to report that not only have I gotten back to even from the double market crash of Oct-Nov 2008 and Feb-early March 2009. I've actually gotten into the black enough that I've been able to take some money out of our one non-IRA account and start paying down some debt.

My basic strategy since late February 2009 has been more or less as follows:

  • First, play guts-ball with the financials and the energy complex, picking up large money center banks (Bank of America, Wells Fargo) a couple regionals I'm familiar with (USB, BB&T), and two insurance companies (MetLife and Prudential); and major oils with high dividends whose stock prices were asininely cheap (Chevron, Conoco-Philips, BP).
  • Next, stacked up, even as the market was tanking, on any large company whose price had fallen so far that it's dividend had become absurdly huge.
  • Closed my eyes at the market bottom and prayed.

As a onetime stockbroker myself who was at my desk when the notorious Hunt Brothers' silver debacle came to a head, I basically know when something's gone way too high, or, conversely, when the market has collapsed into the final black hole of selling known in the trade as "capitulation." In the first few days of March, 2009, we definitely had capitulation. Yeah, I didn't know that exactly, but it was a good guess, based on the obvious fact that people were just frantically selling everything indiscriminately, hand over fist, like there was no tomorrow. It's so overdone that you just know.

I had thought this was happening in October of 2008 and loaded up on the banks at that time--but got killed, as this drop turned out to not have been the real thing. March 2009 was far fiercer, however, and I knew the drop was over, at least for that phase of the Great Bear. So, unlike the dumpers, I bought hand over fist. In the case of the banks, since the Feds had basically said that no more large money center banks would fail, I felt confident in buying, say, Bank of America (BAC) in the single digits. Yeah, they were and are in trouble, but it's because the Feds basically coerced them into buying the trashed remnants of once-great Merrill Lynch on top of their takeover (under) of the criminal enterprise known as Countrywide (with which I had a mortgage, BTW). So, contrary to their price, they weren't going out of biz.

These stocks, of course, and others were in short order swept up by what may go down as the greatest market comeback of all time, made even more fierce by the fact that everyone has been bad-mouthing it all the way up.

As bull fever took over the market in April-June, I swept out of a great deal of positions for a profit, replacing a number of them with some of the market's best-kept secrets: preferred stocks. These are non-voting shares of a company that basically swap your vote (which tends not to count anyway, statistically) for a nice, abnormally high fixed dividend--a dividend that's senior to any dividend on the common stock if bad times hit. Interestingly, most of the preferreds I started buying were in the same beat up banks I've just mentioned, plus others. Since their prices were so depressed, the preferred dividends, as a percentage, were huge, some as high as 14%. It's these stocks I began to use for income. The kicker is that as the banks recovered, so did the preferreds. As their prices went up, the fixed yields went down as a percentage toward a more normal 7-9% or so. Most I'm still holding for the swell income.

Some banks weren't affected by the crisis due to their own peculiar markets and the fact they didn't need TARP money or had paid it back. Two of these banks are really strange beasts I discovered on my own, although to New Yorkers, they're probably old hat. The first is New York Bank (NYB). It specializes in loans used by investors to purchase rent-controlled apartment buildings in New York City. Stock has basically gone nowhere after a mild recovery (people are a little nervous about some of the noises the city is making, re: how some apt. owners may have fudged their numbers). But while I wait, it pays an 8% dividend.

NYB's strange counterpart, Medallion (TAXI) is also a specialty play. The name and the stock symbol tell you all you need to know. This is a bank that, almost exclusively, makes loans that businesses use to purchase NYC taxi medallions. Not being a New Yorker, I had to do a little research on this. What I discovered was that "medallions"--essentially, certificates sold by the city that allow you to operate fleets of taxis in the city--are monstrously expensive and basically require large loans to finance. Which is why TAXI exists. It makes the loans. It makes the money on the loans. And, unlike almost anything else in this rotten economy, taxis in New York City are a highly profitable business model. So densely packed is this city, particularly in Manhattan, that, except for the occasional country excursion, it makes no sense whatsoever to own a car. So if you need to get around on schedule, or if you're a touristo who doesn't know the streets or address system or subway and bus lines, you have to take a cab to get there. Captive customers, the perfect business even in bad times, and thus very little risk to the loans. So TAXI also, currently underpriced, offers a fat dividend of around 8%.

High dividend stocks, preferreds of normal and oddball banks (plus the Preferred M series of storage renting giant American Storage) now serve as a core of my portfolios, along with carefully selected oil and gas drilling trusts and/or partnerships which trade like stocks. Also helping out are another neglected play, closed end investment companies, essentially mutual funds that don't issue any more shares and so trade like stocks on the New York Stock Exchange. Closed end funds that invest in junk bonds are somewhat risky (in my opinion), but the huge dividends, often payable every month, are quite appealing if you're seeking income. And again, I bought most of mine when they were deeply discounted, which closed end funds tend to be, unlike regular mutual funds. The company known as BlackRock has a bunch of them, and I consider these guys pretty good and pretty shrewd managers as opposed to the clowns who went belly-up in the recent debacle.

For tax-haters, BlackRock also has several closed-end funds of municipal bonds of various states, particularly New York and California. The appeal? For those who don't know, the interest on most muni bonds is TAX FREE!! Hurray!! BlackRock has a somewhat thinly traded Virginia muni bond fund (BHV) and I've had a chunk of it for quite some time now, with an average TAX FREE yield of circa 5.5% in Virginia. (I live here. The Feds can't tax muni bonds, although they give it a shot from time to time. Each state can tax the interest on another state's bonds. But nearly always, states don't tax the interest on their own bonds, so if you buy muni bonds or muni bond funds of your home state, you don't have to pay any taxes on them at all, unless you're in the AMT bind. FYI, muni bonds of Washington DC and Puerto Rico are, by statute, untaxable by any state. Last time I looked, cheapskate states that tax their own muni bonds are Wisconsin and Tennessee.)

The other thing that's been important in recovering your money is that you largely need to forget about the old "buy and hold" adage. It's suicide right now. I trade daily--no, I don't consider myself a day-trader, but I move the merchandise a lot, except for some of the high yielding stuff I hold for income.

Finally, I hold a number of small bond positions. Normally, these things are vehicles you buy and hold to collect the interest. You don't expect a capital gain. But many of these bonds got so cheap in the double-crash that I scooped about 2 dozen issues and have capital gains on nearly all. I did make a mistake here, though. When I was in the business, "round lots" of muni and corporate bonds were in 5-10K increments. Well, that's still true for munis, but these days, a round lot of corporates is 25K face value. Having picked up smaller positions based on my previous knowledge, I'm not getting the best prices when I sell some of these "odd lots" which I hadn't thought were odd lots. This old dog has now learned a new trick. Irritating, but not fatal.

Well, I've gone on for a long time, but I felt I should bring this irregular series up to date. Before I head off though, the usual caveat. I'm no longer a registered investment rep, and even if I were, beware: I'm not soliciting or giving advice. I'm only telling you what I know. And nothing I say here either assures or guarantees similar result for anyone else either today, tomorrow, or ever. Travel at your own risk.

Bottom line: you yourself may still be outta work. But you can still make money. And, frankly, I like me as a boss far better than any of the goofballs I've worked for over the last two decades and more.

Name That Party!

This just in from ABC News 2 in Baltimore:
The jury convicted Mayor Sheila Dixon on one count of fraudulent misappropriation by a fiduciary.
 No word yet as to whether Herhonor will step down.

No word from ABC News 2 either about Mayor Dixon's party affiliation. Hint: If she were a Republican, that would've been in the lede.

Just thought you'd like to know. All parties are equal but some are more equal than others.