The White House wants the public to start using the term "global climate disruption" in place of "global warming" -- fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.
No mention of the earlier attempt at "climate change." Nothing to see here folks. Let's move along.
The genius behind the latest revision of this unbelievable chunk of zombie science is none other than
White House science adviser John Holdren [who] urged people to start using the phrase during a speech last week in Oslo, echoing a plea he made three years earlier. Holdren said global warming is a "dangerous misnomer" for a problem far more complicated than a rise in temperature.
Sure it is. Serial lying is always more complicated than the simple initial lie. Holdren, by the way, is a notable radical Idiotarian whose ideas for "saving the planet" also include mass abortion and mass sterilization of women (helps balance the eco-system better) as well as sterilization of "undesirables," presumably Republican women. So much for the "right to choose," eh, John.
How much have we increased the deficit by paying this pompous and dangerous jackass?